Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b93bb/b93bba7fcb410759a6af7d6ef8e106b975761480" alt="Hasselblad X2D 100c front Hasselblad X2D 100c front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Announced September 2022
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The X2D was released 11 years after the E-PL1s which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the X2D matches up versus the E-PL1s with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-PL1s
X2D | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | ![]() | November 2010 | Newer by 144 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+2130k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Hasselblad X2D
E-PL1s | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-PL1s
X2D | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X2D has outside measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the X2D and the E-PL1s.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6161c/6161cc06729aa0ee4270fcc8346194c8e7ed4a92" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the X2D and E-PL1s is 56 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaba9/aaba96cd7ad83d343710a855b19531062e9db449" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison"
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X2D and E-PL1s.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X2D due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will offer more detail as a result of its extra 88 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger X2D should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c369/6c3698fc17170ef48b12a499fcbeedab9a5f6677" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison"
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6583e/6583e56f765c1e5f82b50ecb9dd55f063a69bdcb" alt="Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-07 | 2010-11-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 294 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.60 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.3 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/4000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 290 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $8,199 | $599 |