Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe X2D was manufactured 10 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the X2D matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
X2D | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | February 2012 | More modern by 129 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Hasselblad X2D
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
X2D | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D has got external dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the X2D compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X2D and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 56 and 69 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the X2D and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X2D due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X2D will give you extra detail due to its extra 84MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger X2D will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-07 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Amount of lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4080 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.3 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 400 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $8,199 | $871 |