Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X2D was introduced 12 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the X2D matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X2D | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | March 2010 | Newer by 152 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Hasselblad X2D
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X2D | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D has got exterior measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X2D versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the X2D compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 56 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X2D and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X2D with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will result in greater detail using its extra 90MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images more aggressively. The more recent X2D provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-07 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 294 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4080 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.3 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 410 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $8,199 | $349 |