Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp
56 Imaging
91 Features
78 Overall
85
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced July 2019
- Later Model is Sigma fp L
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Hasselblad X2D versus Sigma fp, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sigma. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and fp (25MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and fp (Full frame) have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X2D was announced 3 years later than the fp and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the X2D grades against the fp in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X2D 100c and Sigma fp. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery and Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Sigma fp
| X2D | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2022 | July 2019 | More recent by 39 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") | |
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 2100k | Clearer screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Hasselblad X2D
| fp | X2D |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Sigma fp
| X2D | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X2D comes with physical measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Sigma fp has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X2D versus Sigma fp in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the X2D versus the fp.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the X2D and fp is 56 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X2D and fp.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X2D using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will render extra detail with its extra 75MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher X2D is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Hasselblad | Sigma |
| Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sigma fp |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2019-07-11 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 100 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 294 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
| Total lenses | 13 | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3.2" |
| Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4080 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.3fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/4000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 895g (1.97 pounds) | 422g (0.93 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $8,199 | $2,050 |