Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86


78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016

Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and Quattro H (APS-H) offer totally different sensor sizes.

The X2D was introduced 6 years later than the Quattro H and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the X2D matches up versus the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Sigma Quattro H
X2D | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | ![]() | February 2016 | More recent by 80 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1620k | Crisper display (+740k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Hasselblad X2D
Quattro H | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Sigma Quattro H
X2D | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X2D provides outer dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the X2D versus the Quattro H.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X2D and Quattro H is 56 and 78 respectively.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X2D and Quattro H.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X2D using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X2D will offer extra detail using its extra 55 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The younger X2D will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X2D vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sigma |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 13 | 76 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.3 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895g (1.97 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $8,199 | $1,134 |