Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
![Hasselblad X2D 100c front Hasselblad X2D 100c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Hasselblad-X2D-100c/Hasselblad-X2D-front.jpg)
![YI M1 front YI M1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/YI-M1/YI-M1-front.jpg)
87 Imaging
60 Features
66 Overall
62
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed September 2016
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and YI. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and M1 (20MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and M1 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The X2D was revealed 6 years later than the M1 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the X2D scores against the M1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & YI M1. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & YI M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the YI M1
X2D | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | ![]() | September 2016 | More recent by 73 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick YI M1 over the Hasselblad X2D
M1 | X2D |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and YI M1
X2D | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X2D features exterior dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the YI M1 has proportions of 114mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the X2D and the M1.
![Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Hasselblad-X2D-100c-vs-YI-M1-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and M1 is 56 and 87 respectively.
![Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Hasselblad-X2D-100c-vs-YI-M1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the X2D and M1.
All in all, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X2D with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X2D will offer you more detail because of its extra 80MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent X2D will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
![Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 sensor size comparison Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Hasselblad-X2D-100c-vs-YI-M1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Hasselblad-X2D-100c-vs-YI-M1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Hasselblad X2D vs YI M1 Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | YI |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | YI M1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4080 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.3 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/4000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) | 350 gr (0.77 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 450 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $8,199 | $320 |