Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
81 Imaging
57 Features
75 Overall
64
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 17MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 392g - 115 x 66 x 64mm
- Revealed August 2018
- Old Model is Panasonic LX100
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic LX100 II, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-320 (14MP) and the LX100 II (17MP) is very well matched but the TG-320 (1/2.3") and LX100 II (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-320 was introduced 7 years before the LX100 II which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic LX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-320 grades vs the LX100 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-320 Gallery and Panasonic LX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Panasonic LX100 II
TG-320 | LX100 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic LX100 II over the Olympus TG-320
LX100 II | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2018 | January 2012 | More modern by 80 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-320 and Panasonic LX100 II
TG-320 | LX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-320 enjoys exterior measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic LX100 II has proportions of 115mm x 66mm x 64mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 392 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-320 versus Panasonic LX100 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-320 compared to the LX100 II.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-320 and LX100 II is 94 and 81 respectively.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-320 and LX100 II.
Plainly, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-320 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Panasonic LX100 II will give you more detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-320 vs Panasonic LX100 II Specifications
Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2018-08-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 17 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4736 x 3552 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-75mm (3.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.7-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,760k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1800 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DMW-BLE9 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 392g (0.86 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 115 x 66 x 64mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 150 images | 340 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $998 |