Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 9000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe C135 was brought out 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the C135 scores vs the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak C135 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus 9000
| C135 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 | May 2009 | Fresher by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Kodak C135
| 9000 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus 9000
| C135 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 enjoys physical measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the C135 vs the 9000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and 9000 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and 9000.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Kodak C135 to produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer C135 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1250 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $300 |