Clicky

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
92
Imaging
37
Features
17
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare C135 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Kodak C135
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2012
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Released May 2009
  • Also Known as mju 9000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Here is a in depth review of the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 9000, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The C135 was brought out 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the C135 scores vs the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

        

Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus 9000

 C135 9000 
ReleasedJanuary 2012May 2009Fresher by 33 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Kodak C135

 9000 C135 
Display size2.7"2.4"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution230k112kSharper display (+118k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus 9000

 C135 9000 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Kodak C135 enjoys physical measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Kodak C135 versus Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the C135 vs the 9000.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C135 and 9000 is 92 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and 9000.

As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Kodak C135 to produce extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The newer C135 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak C135
Portrait photography with Olympus 9000
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
20
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak C135 Street photography details
Olympus 9000 Street photography details
53
environment sealing
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
max ISO too low (1,250)
53
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition in class (225g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak C135 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 9000 as a Sports photography camera
31
decent MP (14 megapixels)
environment sealing
can't change focal length (35mm)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Kodak C135 Travel photography factors
Olympus 9000 Travel photography factors
64
environment sealing
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
58
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
great zoom (280mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (225g)
MP count low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C135
Landscape photography with Olympus 9000
31
decent MP (14MP)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.4")
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,250)
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
31
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak C135
Vlogging with Olympus 9000
25
has face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
27
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
heavier than competition in class (225g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak C135 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C135 and Olympus 9000
 Kodak EasyShare C135Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare C135 Olympus Stylus 9000
Otherwise known as - mju 9000
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-01-10 2009-05-14
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1250 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 50
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35mm (1x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.4 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 112 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 175 grams (0.39 lbs) 225 grams (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $300