Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C135 was introduced 12 months prior to the TG-630 iHS which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the C135 matches up against the TG-630 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C135 Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| C135 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Kodak C135
| TG-630 iHS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| C135 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 has external dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the C135 vs the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and TG-630 iHS is 92 and 94 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Kodak C135 to show extra detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged C135 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $200 |