Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
92 Imaging
38 Features
17 Overall
29
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe C135 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the TG-830 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the C135 matches up versus the TG-830 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C135 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C135 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| C135 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Kodak C135
| TG-830 iHS | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| C135 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C135 has got exterior measurements of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
See the Kodak C135 versus Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the C135 and the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and TG-830 iHS is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the C135 and TG-830 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to result in greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older C135 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Kodak C135 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 112 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175 grams (0.39 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $0 |
