Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80
92 Imaging
37 Features
17 Overall
29
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1250
- 640 x 480 video
- 35mm (F3.0) lens
- 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the C135 (14MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C135 was announced 11 years prior to the WG-80 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the C135 scores vs the WG-80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C135 and Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Kodak C135 Gallery and Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C135 over the Ricoh WG-80
| C135 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Kodak C135
| WG-80 | C135 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2022 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 126 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.70" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-80
| C135 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak C135 has got external dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C135 and Ricoh WG-80 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the C135 against the WG-80.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C135 and WG-80 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the C135 and WG-80.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-80 to provide extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged C135 will be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak C135 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C135 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1250 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 175g (0.39 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $300 |