Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4f52/d4f52e39beb092353224512dc646b19cc509cfae" alt="Samsung HZ50W front Samsung HZ50W front"
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VR-340 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VR-340 was manufactured 21 months later than the HZ50W which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VR-340 grades versus the HZ50W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-340 Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Samsung HZ50W
VR-340 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 21 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus VR-340
HZ50W | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-340 and Samsung HZ50W
VR-340 | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-340 comes with outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VR-340 and the HZ50W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/596eb/596eb0b8c81312fd8b4e290e1e9f0b26d9de1624" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-340 and HZ50W is 96 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb079/fb07963e2c6d9a8133045fe7cab64436a0c829c0" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-340 and HZ50W.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus VR-340 to render more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent VR-340 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39647/396470891205078fd75f20fcba6b82dff5259f37" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f403/4f403155f2ea22dd9e51b4b88803beb329504ab5" alt="Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-340 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VR-340 | Samsung HZ50W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB5500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.7 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $130 | $250 |