Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Old Model is Nikon S9700
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Following is a in depth review of the Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and S9900 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and S9900 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C140 was unveiled 7 years prior to the S9900 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the C140 matches up vs the S9900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Nikon S9900
| C140 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Kodak C140
| S9900 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 74 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Nikon S9900
| C140 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 enjoys external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Nikon S9900 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the S9900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and S9900 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and S9900.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The C140 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Nikon S9900 will offer you more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak C140 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 289 grams (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $80 | $300 |