Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
70 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Launched October 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
- Later Model is Olympus E-510
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the E-500 (8MP) is fairly similar but the C140 (1/2.5") and E-500 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C140 was released 3 years after the E-500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak C140 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the C140 matches up vs the E-500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus E-500. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus E-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus E-500
C140 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2009 | October 2005 | Newer by 40 months | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 215k | Crisper display (+15k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Kodak C140
E-500 | C140 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500
C140 | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 features outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the E-500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and E-500 is 94 and 70 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and E-500.
All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The C140 features the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The fresher C140 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus E-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus E-500 |
Also referred to as | - | EVOLT E-500 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2005-10-21 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 8MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 400 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 13cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 215 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.45x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) |
Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $80 | $600 |