Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Olympus E-500 front
Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Launched October 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-500
  • Later Model is Olympus E-510
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the E-500 (8MP) is fairly similar but the C140 (1/2.5") and E-500 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C140 was released 3 years after the E-500 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak C140 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the C140 matches up vs the E-500 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus E-500

 C140 E-500 
LaunchedJanuary 2009October 2005Newer by 40 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kCrisper display (+15k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Kodak C140

 E-500 C140 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500

 C140 E-500 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 features outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the E-500.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and E-500 is 94 and 70 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and E-500.

All in all, both of the cameras posses the exact same megapixels but different sensor dimensions. The C140 features the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier. The fresher C140 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak C140
Portrait photography with Olympus E-500
18
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (8 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
49
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no liveview
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-500 Street photography highlights
46
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
max ISO too low (1,000)
57
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (479 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-500 Sports photography advice
15
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
37
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography details
Olympus E-500 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (8 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
52
lighter than competitors in class (479g)
built-in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
low resolution sensor (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-500 as a Landscape photography camera
21
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
max ISO too low (1,000)
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging details
Olympus E-500 Vlogging details
21
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
9
lack of video recording
Photography Glossary

Kodak C140 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Olympus E-500
 Kodak EasyShare C140Olympus E-500
General Information
Company Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare C140 Olympus E-500
Also referred to as - EVOLT E-500
Category Small Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2009-01-08 2005-10-21
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 8MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 3264 x 2448
Max native ISO 1000 400
Max boosted ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.7-4.8 -
Macro focus range 13cm -
Total lenses - 45
Crop factor 6.3 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 2.5 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.45x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 160 grams (0.35 pounds) 479 grams (1.06 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $80 $600