Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
![Kodak EasyShare C140 front Kodak EasyShare C140 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-C140/Kodak-C140-front.jpg)
![Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-FE-4000/Olympus-FE-4000-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-925
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Kodak C140 and Olympus FE-4000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and FE-4000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The C140 was released 6 months before the FE-4000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the C140 grades versus the FE-4000 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus FE-4000
C140 | FE-4000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Kodak C140
FE-4000 | C140 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus FE-4000
C140 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Similar generation |
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 provides physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Examine the Kodak C140 and Olympus FE-4000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the C140 and the FE-4000.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-FE-4000-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and FE-4000 is 94 and 95 respectively.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-FE-4000-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and FE-4000.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The C140 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus FE-4000 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-FE-4000-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-C140-vs-Olympus-FE-4000-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Kodak C140 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Other name | - | X-925 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-07-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 13cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 136g (0.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $80 | $130 |