Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5
94 Imaging
30 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
37 Features
51 Overall
42
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-5 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe C140 was launched 9 years before the TG-5 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the C140 matches up against the TG-5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-5
| C140 | TG-5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Kodak C140
| TG-5 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-5
| C140 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 provides physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the TG-5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-5 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and TG-5.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus TG-5 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 20.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $80 | $449 |