Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and TG-5 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C140 was launched 9 years before the TG-5 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the C140 matches up against the TG-5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus TG-5
| C140 | TG-5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Kodak C140
| TG-5 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus TG-5
| C140 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak C140 provides physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus TG-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the C140 compared to the TG-5.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and TG-5 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the C140 and TG-5.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus TG-5 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged C140 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak C140 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2017-05-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 20.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $80 | $449 |