Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Introduced July 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Samsung and Sony. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and T99 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe HZ10W was revealed 14 months prior to the T99 making them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the HZ10W grades against the T99 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung HZ10W & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The full galleries are provided at Samsung HZ10W Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sony T99
| HZ10W | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Samsung HZ10W
| T99 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 14 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sony T99
| HZ10W | T99 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Samsung HZ10W comes with exterior dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony T99 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the HZ10W and the T99.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ10W and T99 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the HZ10W and T99.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony T99 to provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged HZ10W will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony T99 Specifications
| Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung HZ10W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
| Also called as | WB500 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-05-14 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 249g (0.55 pounds) | 121g (0.27 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $300 | $179 |
