Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and VG-160 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe C140 was released 4 years before the VG-160 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the C140 scores against the VG-160 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus VG-160
| C140 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Kodak C140
| VG-160 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus VG-160
| C140 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 provides outside measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 versus Olympus VG-160 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the C140 compared to the VG-160.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and VG-160 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and VG-160.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VG-160 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak C140 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $80 | $90 |