Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Kodak C140 and Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is pretty close but the C140 (1/2.5") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe C140 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the XZ-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the C140 grades versus the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare C140 & Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Olympus XZ-1
| C140 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak C140
| XZ-1 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Olympus XZ-1
| C140 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 features outer dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak C140 and Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the C140 and the XZ-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and XZ-1.
As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 using its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-1 will provide you with more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The older C140 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak C140 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 13cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 275 grams (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $80 | $567 |