Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS30
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Kodak C140 and Panasonic ZS25, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and ZS25 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C140 was revealed 5 years earlier than the ZS25 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the C140 scores vs the ZS25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak C140 Gallery and Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Panasonic ZS25
| C140 | ZS25 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Kodak C140
| ZS25 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Panasonic ZS25
| C140 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 has external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 and Panasonic ZS25 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the C140 vs the ZS25.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and ZS25 is 94 and 93 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the C140 and ZS25.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The C140 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Panasonic ZS25 will provide extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak C140 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 13cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 15s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 6.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 gr (0.35 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $80 | $300 |
