Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Ricoh CX5 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Ricoh CX5
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh CX5, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the C140 (8MP) and the CX5 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the C140 (1/2.5") and CX5 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C140 was released 3 years before the CX5 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the C140 scores vs the CX5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh CX5

 C140 CX5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Kodak C140

 CX5 C140 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2009More recent by 30 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX5

 C140 CX5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak C140 offers physical measurements of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak C140 versus Ricoh CX5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the C140 compared to the CX5.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and CX5 is 94 and 92 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the C140 and CX5.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The C140 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh CX5 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The older C140 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography details
Ricoh CX5 Portrait photography details
18
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (8MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
28
focusing manually
no external flash support
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Street photography factors
46
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
does not have RAW format
maximum ISO low (1,000)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 Sports photography advice
Ricoh CX5 Sports photography advice
15
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect autofocus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh CX5 Travel photography highlights
50
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (8MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
66
lighter than average (205 grams)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak C140 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX5 Landscape photography factors
21
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (8 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
45
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak C140
Vlogging with Ricoh CX5
21
wide angle not great (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic support
30
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Ricoh CX5
 Kodak EasyShare C140Ricoh CX5
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare C140 Ricoh CX5
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-08 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 3264 x 2448 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus distance 13cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 160 gr (0.35 lbs) 205 gr (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 2 x AA DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $80 $399