Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-30 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe C140 was launched 6 years prior to the WG-30 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple view of how the C140 matches up vs the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak C140 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-30
| C140 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Kodak C140
| WG-30 | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 70 months |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30
| C140 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display size |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and size. The Kodak C140 has got physical dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-30 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the C140 and the WG-30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the C140 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The pic underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-30.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The C140 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Ricoh WG-30 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 13cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $80 | $428 |