Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
- 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Kodak and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WB800F (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe C140 was released 5 years before the WB800F and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the C140 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare C140 and Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Kodak C140 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Samsung WB800F
| C140 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Kodak C140
| WB800F | C140 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak C140 and Samsung WB800F
| C140 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak C140 has external dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the C140 and the WB800F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the C140 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WB800F.
Plainly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C140 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung WB800F will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older C140 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Kodak C140 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare C140 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-4.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 13cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 160g (0.35 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $80 | $300 |