Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Nikon. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S6900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe M320 was launched 7 years prior to the S6900 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M320 scores against the S6900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S6900
M320 | S6900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Kodak M320
S6900 | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | January 2009 | Newer by 74 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S6900
M320 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 features external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Nikon S6900 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S6900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M320 vs the S6900.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S6900 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The picture below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and S6900.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Nikon S6900 will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $39 | $190 |