Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S7000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Nikon S7000
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
  • 165g - 99 x 60 x 27mm
  • Revealed February 2015
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Kodak M320 and Nikon S7000, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Kodak and Nikon. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S7000 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S7000 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M320 was released 7 years earlier than the S7000 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M320 matches up versus the S7000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S7000

 M320 S7000 

Reasons to pick Nikon S7000 over the Kodak M320

 S7000 M320 
RevealedFebruary 2015January 2009Newer by 74 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S7000

 M320 S7000 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has got external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S7000 has proportions of 99mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M320 and Nikon S7000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 versus the S7000.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and S7000 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and S7000.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Nikon S7000 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Nikon S7000 Portrait photography details
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low MP (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
36
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Nikon S7000
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than others (155 grams)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competitors in class (165 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Nikon S7000 Sports photography information
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
45
great zoom range (25-500mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low battery (180 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography factors
Nikon S7000 Travel photography factors
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (155 grams)
low MP (9 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
65
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (500mm)
low battery (180 shots)
more heavy than competitors in class (165g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.4)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Nikon S7000
22
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual control
no image stabilization
low MP (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
43
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery (180 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging information
Nikon S7000 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
more heavy than others (155g)
32
reasonably wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.4)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competitors in class (165g)
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S7000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S7000
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S7000
General Information
Company Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S7000
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2015-02-10
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-500mm (20.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.4-6.5
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 9.2 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.70 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 165g (0.36 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 99 x 60 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 180 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7001 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $39 $280