Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70 front
Portability
63
Imaging
40
Features
53
Overall
45

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Panasonic FZ70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 606g - 130 x 97 x 118mm
  • Launched July 2013
Photography Glossary

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Overview

On this page, we are evaluating the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FZ70, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and FZ70 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and FZ70 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M320 was manufactured 5 years before the FZ70 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Panasonic FZ70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the M320 grades vs the FZ70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Panasonic FZ70

 M320 FZ70 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ70 over the Kodak M320

 FZ70 M320 
LaunchedJuly 2013January 2009Newer by 55 months
Manually focus More exact focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FZ70

 M320 FZ70 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ70 has proportions of 130mm x 97mm x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6") with a weight of 606 grams (1.34 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 and Panasonic FZ70 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the FZ70.

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and FZ70 is 95 and 63 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and FZ70.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M320 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Panasonic FZ70 will offer you more detail due to its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FZ70 Portrait photography factors
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
56
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW formats
small sensor (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak M320
Street photography with Panasonic FZ70
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition (155g)
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (606g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography features
Panasonic FZ70 Sports photography features
16
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect autofocus
55
excellent zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
better than average battery (400 per charge)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic FZ70 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (155g)
low resolution (9 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
better than average battery (400 per charge)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (20mm)
long reach (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (606g)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FZ70 Landscape photography highlights
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low resolution (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse mode
54
has manual focus
really wide (20mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (400 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ70 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone port
more heavy than competition (155g)
26
really wide (20mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition (606g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Panasonic FZ70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Panasonic FZ70
 Kodak EasyShare M320Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Panasonic
Model type Kodak EasyShare M320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-01-08 2013-07-18
Physical type Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 23
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 34-102mm (3.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 202k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (50i/60i, 25p/30p), 1280 x 720p (50p/60p or 25p/30p), 640 x 480 (25p/30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 606 gr (1.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 130 x 97 x 118mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 41
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 171
Other
Battery life - 400 shots
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $39 $300