Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Kodak M320 and Samsung SL102, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is relatively close but the M320 (1/2.5") and SL102 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe M320 was manufactured about the same time to the SL102 so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M320 scores vs the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung SL102
| M320 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak M320
| SL102 | M320 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung SL102
| M320 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 provides outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M320 and Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M320 compared to the SL102.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and SL102 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through specifications. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and SL102.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Samsung SL102 will result in extra detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternate name | - | ES55 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155 gr (0.34 lb) | 116 gr (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $39 | $130 |
