Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also referred to as PL65
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and SL620 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and SL620 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M320 was launched about the same time to the SL620 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the M320 grades vs the SL620 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M320 & Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M320 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung SL620
| M320 | SL620 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Kodak M320
| SL620 | M320 |
|---|
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung SL620
| M320 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 provides exterior measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M320 and the SL620.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and SL620.
Plainly, both of those cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Samsung SL620 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Kodak M320 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $39 | $200 |