Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
20
Overall
31

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Announced April 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST93, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and ST93 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and ST93 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The M320 was brought out 3 years before the ST93 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the M320 grades against the ST93 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung ST93

 M320 ST93 

Reasons to pick Samsung ST93 over the Kodak M320

 ST93 M320 
AnnouncedApril 2011January 2009Fresher by 27 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST93

 M320 ST93 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 offers exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST93 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M320 and Samsung ST93 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M320 versus the ST93.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and ST93 is 95 and 97 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M320 and ST93.

As you can see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung ST93 will render more detail having its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST93 Portrait photography details
19
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
30
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography details
Samsung ST93 Street photography details
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (155g)
49
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Samsung ST93 Sports photography information
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
27
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Samsung ST93 Travel photography advice
50
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (155 grams)
MP count low (9 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
70
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography features
Samsung ST93 Landscape photography features
22
no manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
38
great maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung ST93 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
heavier than competitors in class (155g)
27
great maximum aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Kodak M320 vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung ST93
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung ST93
General Information
Brand Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung ST93
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2009-01-08 2011-04-20
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 lb) 110 grams (0.24 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal -
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $39 -