Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
95 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Kodak M320 versus Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and TL240 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and TL240 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M320 was launched 12 months prior to the TL240 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the M320 scores versus the TL240 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M320 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung TL240
| M320 | TL240 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Kodak M320
| TL240 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung TL240
| M320 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 enjoys outer dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Kodak M320 versus Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the M320 against the TL240.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and TL240.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M320 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Samsung TL240 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Kodak M320 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also called | - | ST5000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 9MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 155g (0.34 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $39 | $171 |
