Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2013
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and WB30F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M320 was launched 5 years before the WB30F which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M320 matches up against the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M320 and Samsung WB30F. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M320 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung WB30F
M320 | WB30F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Kodak M320
WB30F | M320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 48 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F
M320 | WB30F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 features external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M320 vs the WB30F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and WB30F is 95 and 96 respectively.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and WB30F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB30F will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung WB30F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M320 | Samsung WB30F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3472 x 2604 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 34-102mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7001 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $39 | $180 |