Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung WB30F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Samsung WB30F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and WB30F (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and WB30F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M320 was launched 5 years before the WB30F which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M320 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB30F being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M320 matches up against the WB30F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung WB30F

 M320 WB30F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Kodak M320

 WB30F M320 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2009Newer by 48 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F

 M320 WB30F 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 features external dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M320 vs the WB30F.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M320 and WB30F is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and WB30F.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M320 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB30F will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged M320 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB30F Portrait photography advice
19
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
no RAW files
35
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB30F Street photography highlights
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
no RAW files
heavier than competition (155g)
64
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Samsung WB30F Sports photography information
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography details
Samsung WB30F Travel photography details
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (155g)
sensor resolution low (9MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M320
Landscape photography with Samsung WB30F
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
43
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging details
Samsung WB30F Vlogging details
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic jack
heavier than competition (155 grams)
33
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors in class (128g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung WB30F
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung WB30F
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung WB30F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-01-08 2013-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lbs) 128g (0.28 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $39 $180