Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced January 2009
Sony T90
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Overview

In this write-up, we are matching up the Kodak M320 vs Sony T90, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and T90 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and T90 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M320 was announced at a similar time to the T90 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the M320 grades vs the T90 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony T90

 M320 T90 

Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Kodak M320

 T90 M320 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony T90

 M320 T90 
IntroducedJanuary 2009February 2009Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Kodak M320 has outside dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony T90 has measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the M320 vs the T90.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M320 and T90 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The image below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and T90.

To sum up, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M320 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sony T90 will offer greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M320
Portrait photography with Sony T90
19
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Sony T90 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than average (155g)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (148 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M320
Sports photography with Sony T90
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Sony T90 Travel photography advice
50
has built in flash
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (155g)
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
51
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (148g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Sony T90 Landscape photography details
22
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.5")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse mode
37
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging highlights
Sony T90 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not good (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
more heavy than average (155 grams)
27
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (148g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M320 vs Sony T90 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony T90
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 148 gr (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $39 $259