Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
37
Overall
38

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Sony WX9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Kodak M320 and Sony WX9, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and WX9 (16MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and WX9 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M320 was announced 24 months earlier than the WX9 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the M320 scores versus the WX9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Sony WX9

 M320 WX9 

Reasons to pick Sony WX9 over the Kodak M320

 WX9 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2011January 2009Fresher by 24 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Sony WX9

 M320 WX9 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M320 has external measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony WX9 has proportions of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M320 and Sony WX9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the M320 compared to the WX9.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and WX9 is 95 and 99 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and WX9.

Plainly, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M320 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony WX9 will offer more detail with its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Sony WX9 Portrait photography highlights
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
30
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Sony WX9 Street photography information
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than average in class (155 grams)
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography advice
Sony WX9 Sports photography advice
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
39
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Sony WX9
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (155 grams)
low resolution (9 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
67
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.6)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Sony WX9 Landscape photography details
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
43
decently wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Sony WX9
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (155g)
33
decently wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M320 vs Sony WX9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Sony WX9
 Kodak EasyShare M320Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9
General Information
Make Kodak Sony
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/2.6-6.3
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology - XtraFine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed - 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.30 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) -
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $39 $188