Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Lets look closer at the Kodak M340 and Kodak M575, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are created by Kodak. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and M575 (14MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M340 was introduced 12 months before the M575 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the M340 grades versus the M575 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Kodak M575

 M340 M575 

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Kodak M340

 M575 M340 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2009Fresher by 12 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Kodak M575

 M340 M575 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M340 enjoys exterior dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Kodak M575 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Kodak M340 and Kodak M575 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the M340 and the M575.

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and M575 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The visual here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M340 and M575.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Kodak M575 to show extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older M340 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Kodak M340
Portrait photography with Kodak M575
19
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography features
Kodak M575 Street photography features
47
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than competitors in class (152g)
low maximum ISO (1,000)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M340 Sports photography information
Kodak M575 Sports photography information
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M340
Travel photography with Kodak M575
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
68
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors in class (152 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Landscape photography camera
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging factors
Kodak M575 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic jack
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competitors in class (152g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M340 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Kodak M575
 Kodak EasyShare M340Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Kodak
Model Kodak EasyShare M340 Kodak EasyShare M575
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-05 2010-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3664 x 2748 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 5 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.7 -
Macro focus distance 7cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 115g (0.25 lb) 152g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $130 $139