Kodak M340 vs Panasonic FP8

Here, we will be contrasting the Kodak M340 versus Panasonic FP8, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the M340 (10MP) and the FP8 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M340 was released 6 months before the FP8 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M340 matches up against the FP8 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M340 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP8. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M340 Gallery & Panasonic FP8 Gallery.

For those who are going to carry your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M340 enjoys external dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FP8 has measurements of 96mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Kodak M340 versus Panasonic FP8 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the M340 and the FP8.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M340 and FP8 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M340 and FP8.

As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Panasonic FP8 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively.