Clicky

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
57
Overall
60

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Launched February 2012
  • Replaced the Samsung NX100
  • Later Model is Samsung NX210
Photography Glossary

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the M340 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M340 was manufactured 4 years prior to the NX200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M340 matches up against the NX200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Samsung NX200

 M340 NX200 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Kodak M340

 NX200 M340 
LaunchedFebruary 2012January 2009Newer by 38 months
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution614k230kCrisper display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200

 M340 NX200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M340 features outside measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M340 and the NX200.

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and NX200 is 96 and 90 respectively.

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M340 and NX200.

As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M340 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX200 will give you more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M340 Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography factors
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
77
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Kodak M340 Street photography information
Samsung NX200 Street photography information
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
73
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (223 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M340
Sports photography with Samsung NX200
16
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
56
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak M340 Travel photography advice
Samsung NX200 Travel photography advice
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
68
lighter than competition in class (223g)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M340 Landscape photography info
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography info
22
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
71
has manual focus
swap lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M340 Vlogging details
Samsung NX200 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
34
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (223 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200
 Kodak EasyShare M340Samsung NX200
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M340 Samsung NX200
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-01-05 2012-02-28
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3664 x 2748 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 5 15
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.7 -
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Amount of lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 7.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 115 grams (0.25 lbs) 223 grams (0.49 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 69
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7001 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $818