Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Later Model is Samsung NX210
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the M340 (10MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the M340 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe M340 was manufactured 4 years prior to the NX200 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak M340 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the M340 matches up against the NX200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M340 and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M340 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Samsung NX200
M340 | NX200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Kodak M340
NX200 | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | January 2009 | Newer by 38 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200
M340 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M340 features outside measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M340 and Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M340 and the NX200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M340 and NX200 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M340 and NX200.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M340 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX200 will give you more detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged M340 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M340 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M340 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Samsung |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M340 | Samsung NX200 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-05 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3664 x 2748 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 5 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 115 grams (0.25 lbs) | 223 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | KLIC-7001 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $130 | $818 |