Kodak M341 vs Nikon S220

Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak M341 versus Nikon S220, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. The resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the S220 (10MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M341 was unveiled 6 months after the S220 so they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the M341 grades vs the S220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M341 & Nikon Coolpix S220. The full galleries are available at Kodak M341 Gallery & Nikon S220 Gallery.

For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Kodak M341 provides outside measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Nikon S220 has specifications of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M341 versus Nikon S220 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the M341 versus the S220.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M341 and S220 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Normally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M341 and S220.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Kodak M341 to result in extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively.