Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
- 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Released May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Later Model is Sony HX300
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Kodak M341 and Sony HX200V, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Kodak and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the M341 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M341 was brought out 3 years prior to the HX200V and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak M341 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M341 scores vs the HX200V in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M341 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M341 Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Sony HX200V
M341 | HX200V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Kodak M341
HX200V | M341 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M341 and Sony HX200V
M341 | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M341 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M341 and Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the M341 and the HX200V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M341 and HX200V is 96 and 66 respectively.
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M341 and HX200V.
As you can see, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Sony HX200V to give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The older M341 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M341 vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M341 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M341 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-29 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-4.8 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 12.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) | 583 gr (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7003 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $130 | $480 |