Kodak M380 vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c4ce/8c4ce20def78097bda6beda7db3d6b1897c27c9f" alt="Kodak EasyShare M380 front Kodak EasyShare M380 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40be7/40be73101854ff246c4cb2cbf4bced3a90580f23" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front"
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Kodak M380 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M380 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The M380 was launched within a month of the T900 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M380 grades versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M380 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M380 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Sony T900
M380 | T900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M380
T900 | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M380 and Sony T900
M380 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2009 | ![]() | February 2009 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M380 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check out the Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M380 vs the T900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80cfd/80cfdd7866731e33baba8803bdba22c8288b2587" alt="Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 size comparison Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M380 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b947/6b947d48376d1ad3130b3718d25ba31c7fd7e55d" alt="Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M380 and T900.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony T900 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebd7e/ebd7e4739de744695a8c21bc43174fb209b95806" alt="Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23fe4/23fe4c43a0f064a2c438b53705ffa2cebe7820c9" alt="Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M380 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Sony |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M380 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-190mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1448 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.50 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 155g (0.34 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7003 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $160 | $300 |