Clicky

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Overview

Below is a extended assessment of the Kodak M380 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. The sensor resolution of the M380 (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M380 was launched within a month of the T900 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the M380 grades versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Sony T900

 M380 T900 

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Kodak M380

 T900 M380 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M380 and Sony T900

 M380 T900 
IntroducedJanuary 2009February 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M380 has got outside measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M380 vs the T900.

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M380 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M380 and T900.

Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony T900 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively.

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony T900 as a Portrait photography camera
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Kodak M380 Street photography info
Sony T900 Street photography info
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Sports photography camera
Sony T900 as a Sports photography camera
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,448 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M380
Travel photography with Sony T900
50
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
51
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M380 Landscape photography factors
Sony T900 Landscape photography factors
27
screen size is decent (3")
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
36
has manual focus
lovely big screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M380
Vlogging with Sony T900
22
wide angle not good (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
28
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M380 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M380 and Sony T900
 Kodak EasyShare M380Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M380 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2009-01-08 2009-02-17
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 38-190mm (5.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1448 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 2.50 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 143g (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7003 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $160 $300