Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus 6000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6000 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 6000 was introduced 3 years before the TG-820 iHS which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the 6000 grades against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| 6000 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus 6000
| TG-820 iHS | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| 6000 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6000 has outside dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6000 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the 6000 compared to the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and TG-820 iHS is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The picture below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6000 and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-820 iHS to offer more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6000 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Also called | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $259 | $500 |
