Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82cbe/82cbe61a86ffcc734d29ce0edb5b8d939f918290" alt="Kodak EasyShare M530 front Kodak EasyShare M530 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The M530 was brought out 12 months later than the SP-565UZ which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the M530 scores versus the SP-565UZ in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M530 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M530 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
M530 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Kodak M530
SP-565UZ | M530 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus SP-565UZ
M530 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Kodak M530 enjoys physical dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the M530 and the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a7a7/9a7a7e5b8adf6c51d36112ebeedd13a127ffd238" alt="Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M530 and SP-565UZ is 95 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36451/364519a52a7f253b5198dbe33582c3192c2a7e73" alt="Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M530 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Kodak M530 to resolve more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher M530 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/babdc/babdc8ca24c5b2b4326307aa79c3063c932fd24c" alt="Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f97/e4f975f665e2410c8e7e1a21727fc65c6a2c5660" alt="Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Kodak M530 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Olympus |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lb) | 413 gr (0.91 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $110 | $400 |