Clicky

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
 
Olympus Stylus 9000 front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
20
Overall
28

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs

Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Olympus 9000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju 9000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Kodak M530 and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The M530 was launched 8 months later than the 9000 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M530 scores versus the 9000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus 9000

 M530 9000 
RevealedJanuary 2010May 2009Fresher by 8 months

Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Kodak M530

 9000 M530 

Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus 9000

 M530 9000 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak M530 features exterior dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has sizing of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).

Check the Kodak M530 and Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the M530 against the 9000.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and 9000 is 95 and 92 respectively.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M530 and 9000.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels and you can expect comparable quality of photos though you need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger M530 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M530 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus 9000 Portrait photography highlights
20
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
20
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Kodak M530 Street photography information
Olympus 9000 Street photography information
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low maximum ISO (1,000)
53
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M530 Sports photography information
Olympus 9000 Sports photography information
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
27
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak M530 Travel photography advice
Olympus 9000 Travel photography advice
58
has built in flash
great max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
58
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (225g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M530 Landscape photography info
Olympus 9000 Landscape photography info
27
great max aperture (f)
no manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
lack of RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M530 Vlogging factors
Olympus 9000 Vlogging factors
25
great max aperture (f)
wide angle not great (36mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic support
27
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone jack
more heavy than competitors in class (225 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M530 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M530 and Olympus 9000
 Kodak EasyShare M530Olympus Stylus 9000
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare M530 Olympus Stylus 9000
Other name - mju 9000
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2009-05-14
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1000 1600
Min native ISO 80 50
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-280mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-5.9
Macro focusing distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/8 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lbs) 225 gr (0.50 lbs)
Physical dimensions 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7006 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $110 $300