Clicky

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M530 front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Kodak M530
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is pretty close but the M530 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") come with totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M530 was released 12 months prior to the XZ-1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the M530 grades vs the XZ-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus XZ-1

 M530 XZ-1 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Kodak M530

 XZ-1 M530 
LaunchedJanuary 2011January 2010Fresher by 12 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution614k230kCrisper screen (+384k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus XZ-1

 M530 XZ-1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M530 provides external measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

See the Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M530 compared to the XZ-1.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M530 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the M530 and XZ-1.

As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M530 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak M530 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older M530 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M530 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Portrait photography camera
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
45
manual focus
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M530 Street photography factors
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography factors
47
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
max ISO too low (1,000)
59
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
heavier than competition in class (275g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M530 Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Sports photography info
17
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
good battery power (320 per charge)
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M530
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-1
58
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
62
good battery power (320 CIPA)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (275g)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M530 Landscape photography information
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography information
27
good max aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
54
manual focus
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (320 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M530
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-1
25
good max aperture (f)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
31
really wide (28mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic port
heavier than competition in class (275g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M530 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M530 and Olympus XZ-1
 Kodak EasyShare M530Olympus XZ-1
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare M530 Olympus XZ-1
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-05 2011-01-26
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.63"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 3664 x 2752
Highest native ISO 1000 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/8s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 150 gr (0.33 lb) 275 gr (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 34
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 117
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $110 $567