Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
Kodak M530
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the M530 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M530 was revealed 4 months earlier than the FX75 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the M530 scores versus the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M530 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are available at Kodak M530 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Panasonic FX75
| M530 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Kodak M530
| FX75 | M530 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Panasonic FX75
| M530 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | June 2010 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M530 features exterior dimensions of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the M530 versus the FX75.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and FX75 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M530 and FX75.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Panasonic FX75 to show more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Kodak M530
Portrait photography with Panasonic FX75
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Kodak M530 Street photography info
Panasonic FX75 Street photography info
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
max ISO too low (1,000)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Kodak M530 Sports photography features
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography features
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Kodak M530
Travel photography with Panasonic FX75
flash built-in
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
comes with focus via touch
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Kodak M530 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic FX75 Landscape photography highlights
very good maximum aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse function
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
small screen (2.7")
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Kodak M530 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Vlogging camera
very good maximum aperture (f)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic port
relatively wide (24mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak M530 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M530 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Panasonic |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 150 gr (0.33 lbs) | 165 gr (0.36 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $110 | $139 |
