Clicky

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak EasyShare M550 front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Kodak M550
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 125g - 98 x 58 x 23mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Kodak M550 versus Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. The resolution of the M550 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M550 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-M1 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the M550 matches up vs the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M550 over the Ricoh WG-M1

 M550 WG-M1 
Display dimensions2.7"1.5"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution230k115kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Kodak M550

 WG-M1 M550 
IntroducedSeptember 2014January 2010Fresher by 57 months

Common features in the Kodak M550 and Ricoh WG-M1

 M550 WG-M1 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M550 comes with outside dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M550 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M550 versus the WG-M1.

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the M550 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M550 and WG-M1.

As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older M550 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M550 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography details
21
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
29
megapixel count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M550 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Street photography camera
54
lighter than average (125g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
maximum ISO low (1,000)
52
environment proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
max ISO too low (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M550 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography info
17
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
37
megapixel count good (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 CIPA)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M550
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-M1
67
lighter than average (125 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
64
better than average battery power (350 shots)
environment proof
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M550 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
31
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
35
megapixel count good (14MP)
environment proof
better than average battery power (350 shots)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (1.5")
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (800)
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M550 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging information
31
rather wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
lighter than average (125 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
26
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M550 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M550 and Ricoh WG-M1
 Kodak EasyShare M550Ricoh WG-M1
General Information
Company Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare M550 Ricoh WG-M1
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Introduced 2010-01-05 2014-09-12
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1000 800
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) (1×)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 1.5"
Display resolution 230k dots 115k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.50 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format - H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 190 gr (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 98 x 58 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7006 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, double) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal microSD/microSDHC, internal
Card slots One One
Retail cost $119 $2,000