Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S230 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Nikon S230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 115g - 91 x 57 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S230, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and S230 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M575 was launched 12 months after the S230 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M575 matches up vs the S230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S230

 M575 S230 
IntroducedJanuary 2010February 2009More modern by 12 months

Reasons to pick Nikon S230 over the Kodak M575

 S230 M575 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S230

 M575 S230 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Kodak M575 provides exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S230 has measurements of 91mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak M575 versus Nikon S230 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the M575 compared to the S230.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and S230 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and S230.

All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Kodak M575 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer M575 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography details
Nikon S230 Portrait photography details
28
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography details
Nikon S230 Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
max ISO too low (1,000)
57
has image stabilization (Digital)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography factors
Nikon S230 Sports photography factors
26
decent MP (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
26
has image stabilization (Digital)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S230 as a Travel photography camera
68
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
51
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography information
Nikon S230 Landscape photography information
40
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
31
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Digital)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Nikon S230
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition (152g)
28
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Digital)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S230
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S230
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S230
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2009-02-03
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1000 2000
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 11.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 115g (0.25 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 91 x 57 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (3 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $139 $150