Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S6900 front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Nikon S6900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
  • 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Launched February 2015
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Overview

Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S6900 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The M575 was released 6 years prior to the S6900 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M575 grades vs the S6900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S6900

 M575 S6900 

Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Kodak M575

 S6900 M575 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2010More modern by 62 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S6900

 M575 S6900 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the M575 against the S6900.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and S6900 is 95 and 93 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and S6900.

All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S6900 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography information
Nikon S6900 Portrait photography information
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
35
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography factors
Nikon S6900 Street photography factors
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than competition (152g)
low max ISO (1,000)
62
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competitors (181g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography details
Nikon S6900 Sports photography details
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
41
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (180 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography factors
Nikon S6900 Travel photography factors
68
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
67
megapixel count good (16MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (180 shots)
heavier than competitors (181 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography advice
Nikon S6900 Landscape photography advice
40
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3")
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
has no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
41
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
bad battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Nikon S6900
28
rather wide (28mm)
great max aperture (f)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone support
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
70
fairly wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of mic port
heavier than competitors (181g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon S6900
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon Coolpix S6900
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon Coolpix S6900
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2015-02-10
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1000 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 25-300mm (12.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-6.3
Macro focus range 10cm 2cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 2.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off -
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 pounds) 181 grams (0.40 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 180 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL19
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $139 $190