Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2027/c2027a9ccc68bbbd675c101327c04ce71c3d1bb8" alt="Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53edf/53edfff75b46825e3fbea61b649a57f112f44ae7" alt="Nikon Coolpix S6900 front Nikon Coolpix S6900 front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S6900 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The M575 was released 6 years prior to the S6900 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M575 grades vs the S6900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Nikon Coolpix S6900. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery and Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S6900
M575 | S6900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Kodak M575
S6900 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 62 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S6900
M575 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 has outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the M575 against the S6900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f81a7/f81a7bc9663d43d4f1be3b4510fd30ffa187eb45" alt="Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M575 and S6900 is 95 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa42d/aa42dc0c8f0dc22f09eb8a2a82f2bedc5dade265" alt="Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 top view buttons comparison"
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and S6900.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon S6900 to deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec1ce/ec1cea0dd4e36a7a83e144307449ca2553fd5175" alt="Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 sensor size comparison"
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba36d/ba36dc75ce4480d532e4c7bf1ee301ea525fdab1" alt="Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Nikon |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 181 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $139 | $190 |