Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Nikon D3200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
64
Features
63
Overall
63

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2010
Nikon D3200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
  • Announced July 2012
  • Old Model is Nikon D3100
  • Updated by Nikon D3300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Kodak M575 and Nikon D3200, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Kodak and Nikon. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and D3200 (24MP) and the M575 (1/2.3") and D3200 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The M575 was launched 3 years earlier than the D3200 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon D3200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M575 grades versus the D3200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon D3200

 M575 D3200 

Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Kodak M575

 D3200 M575 
AnnouncedJuly 2012January 2010More modern by 31 months
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen resolution921k230kSharper screen (+691k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon D3200

 M575 D3200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 has got exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon D3200 has proportions of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M575 and Nikon D3200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the M575 against the D3200.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M575 and D3200 is 95 and 67 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The pic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and D3200.

To sum up, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M575 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Nikon D3200 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography information
Nikon D3200 Portrait photography information
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
78
focusing manually
good megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography advice
Nikon D3200 Street photography advice
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
more heavy than competition (152 grams)
low max ISO (1,000)
60
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography details
Nikon D3200 Sports photography details
26
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
65
good megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
supports phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon D3200 as a Travel photography camera
68
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (152g)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
good megapixels (24MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography details
Nikon D3200 Landscape photography details
40
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,000)
lacks RAW files
no Timelapse function
69
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Nikon F mount)
screen size is good (3")
good megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M575
Vlogging with Nikon D3200
28
really wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition (152g)
27
comes with face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external mic support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Nikon D3200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Nikon D3200
 Kodak EasyShare M575Nikon D3200
General Information
Make Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Nikon D3200
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2010-01-05 2012-07-25
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - Expeed 3
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 6016 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 1000 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO - 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 11
Cross focus points - 1
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Nikon F
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Number of lenses - 309
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.50 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/200 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Optional
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lb) 505 gr (1.11 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 81
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.2
DXO Low light score not tested 1131
Other
Battery life - 540 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 EN-EL14
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant
Card slots One One
Retail price $139 $530