Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Kodak EasyShare M575 front Kodak EasyShare M575 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-EasyShare-M575/Kodak-M575-front.jpg)
![Samsung PL170 front Samsung PL170 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-PL170/Samsung-PL170-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
39 Features
20 Overall
31
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 95 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the PL170 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The M575 was released 12 months prior to the PL170 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M575 matches up against the PL170 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Samsung PL170. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery and Samsung PL170 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Samsung PL170
M575 | PL170 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung PL170 over the Kodak M575
PL170 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Samsung PL170
M575 | PL170 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M575 enjoys outer measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL170 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the M575 and the PL170.
![Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 size comparison Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Samsung-PL170-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and PL170 is 95 and 99 respectively.
![Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 top view buttons comparison Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Samsung-PL170-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and PL170.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung PL170 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged M575 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 sensor size comparison Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Samsung-PL170-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Screen and ViewFinder
![Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Kodak-EasyShare-M575-vs-Samsung-PL170-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Kodak M575 vs Samsung PL170 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Samsung PL170 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Samsung PL170 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | - |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | - |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 95 x 57 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $139 | $175 |