Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58c53/58c53fd189a0b402571d0bfc738fe9c100c02101" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 152g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and FH27 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FH27 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-620 was released 18 months prior to the FH27 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH27 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-620 matches up vs the FH27 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FH27 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FH27
E-620 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH27 over the Olympus E-620
FH27 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH27
E-620 | FH27 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 has got exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FH27 has proportions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 compared to the FH27.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d6a6/7d6a69a518c3263755f7509399b872d6b4772f67" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FH27 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0e70/a0e7055eff464792b91e69242df8d648a2247584" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and FH27.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FH27 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4ecf/b4ecfd73eafcab3c8c355715caf9d93bc5d6d5f2" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e5a/50e5a4e737d6b4bc71eef6c785d933e3f861f2c3" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH27 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 152g (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 250 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $229 |